极速赛车

Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

February 04, 2016

RAZAK et al v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al

Track this case

Case Number:

2:16-cv-00573

Court:

Pennsylvania Eastern

Nature of Suit:

Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

MICHAEL M. BAYLSON

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

View recent docket activity

Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.

Coverage

  1. April 01, 2025

    Uber Case Shouldn't Head To Pa. Justices, 3rd Circ. Told

    The Third Circuit has already made clear which standard applies to determine whether workers are independent contractors or employees under Pennsylvania law, said the Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry, backing Uber's arguments to not send a misclassification case to the state justices.

24 other articles on this case. View all »

Parties

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what鈥檚 happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. 极速赛车 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Direct access to case information and documents.
  • All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
  • Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
  • No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

View the parties now

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm 极速赛车's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!